Preview

Medical Genetics

Advanced search

Attitudes of newborns` mothers toward neonatal whole exome testing: results of a combined study

https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2023.09.40-46

Abstract

The article presents the results of a combined (mixed) empirical study of attitudes of newborns’ mothers’ toward whole exome testing in neonatology, conducted in 2021-2022 at the «National medical research center for obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov». The study involved questionnaires of 328 women and 31 semi-structured in-depth interviews with some of them. The study revealed a significant interest of respondents in neonatal genetic testing, which correlates with high trust in scientific knowledge in the field of medical genetics, achievements and discoveries in the field of science and technology. The development and expansion of genetic testing programs in neonatology requires the formulation of informing criteria, taking into account the degree of risk, availability of treatment and other factors. Also, further research is required to assess the risk of specific diseases, which will make it possible to apply the achievements of genetics not only for diagnosis and prevention, but also for family planning.

About the Authors

D. Yu. Trofimov
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



E. L. Sim
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



E. G. Grebenshchikova
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

1, Ostrovityanova st., Moscow, 117997



E. A. Pomerantseva
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



N. S. Pavlova
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



A. I. Korovko
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



O. A. Buyanovskaya
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



G. S. Vasiliev
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



A. S. Bolshakova
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



N. V. Zaretskaya
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



E. S. Shubina
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I.Kulakov
Russian Federation

4, Akademika Oparina st., Moscow, 117997



References

1. Collins F. S., Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. New England journal of medicine. 2015; 372(9):793-795.

2. Newson A. J. The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: The case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing. Human Genetics. 2022; 141(5):1035-1043.

3. Roman T. S. et al. Genomic sequencing for newborn screening: results of the NC NEXUS project. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2020; 107(4): 596-611.

4. Powell C. M. What genomic sequencing can offer universal newborn screening programs. Hastings Center Report. 2018; 48: S18-S19.

5. Gereis J. et al. Parents’ understanding of genome and exome sequencing for pediatric health conditions: a systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2022; 30(11): 1216-1225.

6. Tolusso L. K. et al. Pediatric Whole Exome Sequencing: an Assessment of Parents’ Perceived and Actual Understanding. Journal of genetic counseling. 2017; 26:792-805.

7. Chassagne A. et al. Exome sequencing in clinical settings: preferences and experiences of parents of children with rare diseases (SEQUAPRE study). European Journal of Human Genetics. 2019; 27(5):701710.

8. Rini C. et al. Genomic knowledge in the context of diagnostic exome sequencing: changes over time, persistent subgroup differences, and associations with psychological sequencing outcomes. Genetics in Medicine. 2020; 22(1):60-68.

9. Dodson D. S. et al. Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing. Public Health Genomics. 2015; 18(3):151-159.

10. Genetti C. A. et al. Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project. Genetics in Medicine. 2019; 21(3): 622-630.

11. Bredenoord A. L., De Vries M. C., Van Delden J. J. M. Next-generation sequencing: does the next generation still have a right to an open future? Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14(5):306-306.

12. Bradbury A. R. et al. Parent opinions regarding the genetic testing of minors for BRCA1/2. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010; 28(21): 3498-3505.

13. Harris E. D. et al. The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository. Genetics in Medicine. 2012; 14(3):330-337.

14. Sivell S. et al. How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review. Journal of genetic counseling. 2008;17(1): 30-63.

15. Grimes D. A., Snively G. R. Patients’ understanding of medical risks: implications for genetic counseling. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1999; 93(6):910-914.

16. Chapman R. et al. New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated. Journal of community genetics. 2019;10:73-84.

17. Sturgis P., Cooper H., Fife-Schaw C. Attitudes to biotechnology: Estimating the opinions of a better-informed public. New genetics and society. 2005; 24(1):31-56.

18. Ashida S. et al. Age differences in genetic knowledge, health literacy and causal beliefs for health conditions. Public health genomics. 2011; 14(4-5):307-316.

19. Allum N. et al. Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science. 2014; 23(7):833-849.


Review

For citations:


Trofimov D.Yu., Sim E.L., Grebenshchikova E.G., Pomerantseva E.A., Pavlova N.S., Korovko A.I., Buyanovskaya O.A., Vasiliev G.S., Bolshakova A.S., Zaretskaya N.V., Shubina E.S. Attitudes of newborns` mothers toward neonatal whole exome testing: results of a combined study. Medical Genetics. 2023;22(9):40-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2023.09.40-46

Views: 165


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-7998 (Print)