Интерпретация клинически значимых вариаций числа копий ДНК
Аннотация
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Н. В. ШиловаРоссия
М. Е. Миньженкова
Россия
Список литературы
1. Miller D, Adam M, Aradhya S. et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;86:749-764.
2. Ahn J, Bint S, Bergbaum A. et al. Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2013;6:16.
3. Lay-Son G, Espinoza K, Vial C. et al. Chromosomal microarrays testing in children with developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies. J. Pediatr (Rio J). 2015;91:189-195.
4. Ho KS, Wassman ER, Baxter AL. et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis of consecutive individuals with autism spectrum disorders using an ultra-high resolution chromosomal microarray optimized for neurodevelopmental disorders. 2016;17(12): 2070.
5. Fan Y, Wu Y, Wang L. et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis in developmental delay and intellectual disability with comorbid conditions. BMC Medical Genomics. 2018;11:49.
6. Kang, S-H, Shaw C, Ou G.et al. Insertional translocation detected using FISH confirmation of array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results.Am. J. Med. Genet. 2010;152A:1111 - 1126.
7. Bui T, Vetro A, Zuffardi O. et al. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosomal analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat. Diagn. 2011;31:235-243.
8. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxford monographs of medical genetics no. 6, Gardner RJ, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG (eds); Int. Oxford press 2012.
9. Золотухина ТВ., Канивец ИВ., Коростелев СА. и др. Опыт использования комплекса современных методов исследования в конституциональной цитогенетике. Медицинская генетика. 2014;(12):22-28.
10. Hermetz KE, Newman S, Connely KN. et al. Large inverted duplications in the human genome form via a fold-back mechanism. PLOS Genetics. 2014;10(1):e1004139.
11. Weckselblatt B, Rudd MK. Human structural variation: mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangements. Trends in Genetics. 2015;31(10):587-599.
12. Миньженкова МЕ, Маркова ЖГ, Дадали ЕЛ, Шилова НВ. Интерхромосомная и интрахромосомная инсерции с участием хромосомы 2. Медицинская генетика. 2018;17(2):12-17.
13. Shaffer LG, Rosenfeld JA. Microarray-based prenatal diagnosis for the identification of fetal chromosome abnormalities. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2013;13(6):601-611.
14. Liehr T. «Classical genetics» is not equal to «banding cytogenetics». Molecular Cytogenetics. 2017;10:3.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Шилова Н.В., Миньженкова М.Е. Интерпретация клинически значимых вариаций числа копий ДНК. Медицинская генетика. 2018;17(10):15-19. https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2018.10.15-19
For citation:
Shilova N.V., Minzhenkova M.E. Interpretation of pathogenic copy number variations. Medical Genetics. 2018;17(10):15-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2018.10.15-19