Интерпретация клинически значимых вариаций числа копий ДНК
https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2018.10.15-19
Аннотация
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Н. В. ШиловаРоссия
М. Е. Миньженкова
Россия
Список литературы
1. Miller D, Adam M, Aradhya S. et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;86:749-764.
2. Ahn J, Bint S, Bergbaum A. et al. Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2013;6:16.
3. Lay-Son G, Espinoza K, Vial C. et al. Chromosomal microarrays testing in children with developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies. J. Pediatr (Rio J). 2015;91:189-195.
4. Ho KS, Wassman ER, Baxter AL. et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis of consecutive individuals with autism spectrum disorders using an ultra-high resolution chromosomal microarray optimized for neurodevelopmental disorders. 2016;17(12): 2070.
5. Fan Y, Wu Y, Wang L. et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis in developmental delay and intellectual disability with comorbid conditions. BMC Medical Genomics. 2018;11:49.
6. Kang, S-H, Shaw C, Ou G.et al. Insertional translocation detected using FISH confirmation of array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results.Am. J. Med. Genet. 2010;152A:1111 - 1126.
7. Bui T, Vetro A, Zuffardi O. et al. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosomal analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat. Diagn. 2011;31:235-243.
8. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxford monographs of medical genetics no. 6, Gardner RJ, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG (eds); Int. Oxford press 2012.
9. Золотухина ТВ., Канивец ИВ., Коростелев СА. и др. Опыт использования комплекса современных методов исследования в конституциональной цитогенетике. Медицинская генетика. 2014;(12):22-28.
10. Hermetz KE, Newman S, Connely KN. et al. Large inverted duplications in the human genome form via a fold-back mechanism. PLOS Genetics. 2014;10(1):e1004139.
11. Weckselblatt B, Rudd MK. Human structural variation: mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangements. Trends in Genetics. 2015;31(10):587-599.
12. Миньженкова МЕ, Маркова ЖГ, Дадали ЕЛ, Шилова НВ. Интерхромосомная и интрахромосомная инсерции с участием хромосомы 2. Медицинская генетика. 2018;17(2):12-17.
13. Shaffer LG, Rosenfeld JA. Microarray-based prenatal diagnosis for the identification of fetal chromosome abnormalities. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2013;13(6):601-611.
14. Liehr T. «Classical genetics» is not equal to «banding cytogenetics». Molecular Cytogenetics. 2017;10:3.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Шилова Н.В., Миньженкова М.Е. Интерпретация клинически значимых вариаций числа копий ДНК. Медицинская генетика. 2018;17(10):15-19. https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2018.10.15-19
For citation:
Shilova N.V., Minzhenkova M.E. Interpretation of pathogenic copy number variations. Medical Genetics. 2018;17(10):15-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2018.10.15-19