

The ICM method in clinical practice
https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2025.07.61-63
Abstract
Introduction. Not always patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have clinical manifestations characteristic of the disease, which is determined by the patient’s genotype. The «ICM» method plays a special role in diagnostics with borderline sweat test values and rare genetic variants.
Objective: to evaluate the use of the intestinal current measurement (ICM) method for clinical practice.
Methods. ICM was carried out according to the European SOP V2.7_26.10.11. 154 people were examined: 18 healthy people (control group), 36 patients with suspected cystic fibrosis, 100 patients with cystic fibrosis (genetic variants of various classes – I, II, IV, V) of which 21 patients with rare genetic variants not described earlier, the effectiveness of targeted therapy was assessed in 34 patients.
Results. 36 patients with suspected CF (carriers of 1 CFTR variant, atypical clinical picture) were examined. The diagnosis was removed in 23 patients, and confirmed in 10. The following genetic variants were identified and described for the first time: 1898+2T>C, G1047S, 3321delG, 712-1G>T, Q1352P, c.1584+18672A>G, E873X, D443fs, W277X, W361X, D579Y, N505H, E403D, S1455X. The function of ion channels was studied in the variants typical for the Russian Federation: E92K, W1282R, N1303K, R334W, 3272-16T>A, in carriers of complex alleles F508del;L467F, S466X;R1070Q and E217G;G509D. The effectiveness of targeted therapy was assessed in 34 patients.
Conclusions. The ICM method helps clinical physicians establish or exclude the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, especially in the case of newly identified genetic variants of the CFTR gene, and assess the effectiveness of therapy with CFTR modulators.
About the Authors
Yu. L. MelyanovskayaRussian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115522
E. I. Kondratyeva
Russian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115522
References
1. De Boeck K. Cystic fibrosis in the year 2020: A disease with a new face. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(5):893-899. doi: 10.1111/apa.15155
2. Servidoni M.F., Gomez C.C.S., Marson F.A.L., Toro A.A.D.C., Ribeiro M.Â.G.O., Ribeiro J.D., Ribeiro A.F.; Grupo Colaborativo de Estudos em Fibrose Cística. Sweat test and cystic fibrosis: overview of test performance at public and private centers in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2017;43(2):121-128. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000076
3. Mishra A., Greaves R., Massie J. The relevance of sweat testing for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in the genomic era. Clin Biochem Rev. 2005;26(4):135-53.
4. Davis P.B. Cystic fibrosis since 1938. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(5):475-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-840OE.
5. Katsanis S.H., Katsanis N. Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(6):415-26. doi: 10.1038/nrg3493.
6. Graeber S.Y., Vitzthum C., Mall M.A. Potential of Intestinal Current Measurement for Personalized Treatment of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. J Pers Med. 2021;11(5):384. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050384.
7. Minso R., Schulz A., Dopfer C., et al. Intestinal current measurement and nasal potential difference to make a diagnosis of cases with inconclusive CFTR genetics and sweat test. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020;7(1):e000736. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000736.
8. Klinicheskiye rekomendatsii «Kistoznyy fibroz (mukovistsidoz)», 2021 [Clinical guidelines «Cystic fibrosis (mucoviscidosis)», 2021]. (In Russ.) https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/372_2 (date of access 02/25/2025)
Review
For citations:
Melyanovskaya Yu.L., Kondratyeva E.I. The ICM method in clinical practice. Medical Genetics. 2025;24(7):61-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2025.07.61-63