Preview

Medical Genetics

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Mutational status of BRAF, NRAS genes in tumor material of patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma

https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2024.07.51-56

Abstract

Melanoma is a complex disease influenced by changes in multiple genes and metabolic pathways that continue to evolve throughout the disease. Research into the genetic and molecular characteristics of melanoma is important for the development of new treatment strategies. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the survival rate and mutational status of the BRAF and NRAS genes in tumor material from patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma. A total of 54 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma were included in the study: 36% were men (n=15), and women were 64% (n=39). The average age at diagnosis was 56 years. DNA was isolated from sections of paraffin blocks (FFPE) using a commercial kit QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGENE, Germany). Analysis of the V600E mutation of the BRAF gene was carried out by allele-specific real-time PCR.  Exons 2 and 3 in the NRAS gene were analyzed by classical PCR (C1000 Touch BioRad, USA) followed by direct Sanger sequencing (ABI Prism 3500, Applied Biosystems, USA). Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using the Statistica 7.0 program. BRAF mutations were detected in 42.6% (V600E mutation 37.1%, V600K 5.4%), and NRAS mutations in 14.8% (Q61K 7%). In the remaining cases (42.6%), no changes were detected in any of the genes analyzed. The mutation status was closely related to the anatomical location of the tumor, so in the group with mutations in the BRAF and NRAS genes (65.3% and 37.0%, respectively; p = 0.002) patients with cutaneous primary lesions of the head and neck were noted. Mitotic activity was more frequently detected in primary tumors from patients with NRAS mutations than in patients with BRAF mutations (p = 0.002). 

Keywords


About the Authors

Yu. Yu. Stefanova
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

4 Mitrofana Sedina st., Krasnodar, 350063



N. V. Porkhanova
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

4 Mitrofana Sedina st., Krasnodar, 350063



R. A. Murashko
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

4 Mitrofana Sedina st., Krasnodar, 350063



N. V. Timoshkina
National Medical Research Centre for Oncology
Russian Federation

14th line st., 63, 344037, Rostov-on-Don



A. Yu. Maksimov
National Medical Research Centre for Oncology
Russian Federation

14th line st., 63, 344037, Rostov-on-Don



S. V. Timofeeva
National Medical Research Centre for Oncology
Russian Federation

Sofia V. Timofeeva

14th line st., 63, 344037, Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Schadendorf D., Fisher D.E., Garbe C., et al. Melanoma. Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2015;1:15003. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.3

2. Delyon J., Lebbe C., Dumaz N. Targeted therapies in melanoma beyond BRAF: targeting NRAS-mutated and KIT-mutated melanoma. Current opinion in oncology, 2020;32(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000606

3. Murphy B.M., Terrell E.M., Chirasani V.R., et al. Enhanced BRAF engagement by NRAS mutants capable of promoting melanoma initiation. Nature communications, 2022:13(1):3153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30881-9

4. Heppt M.V., Siepmann T., Engel J., et al. Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care. BMC cancer, 2017;17(1):536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5

5. Wellbrock C., Karasarides M., Marais R. The RAF proteins take centre stage. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology, 2004;5(11):875-885.

6. Mandalà M., Voit C. Targeting BRAF in melanoma: biological and clinical challenges. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2013;87(3):239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.01.003

7. Jakob J.A., Bassett R.L. Jr., Ng C.S., et al. NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma. Cancer, 2012;118(16):4014–4023. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26724

8. Ugurel S., Thirumaran R.K., Bloethner S., et al. B-RAF and N-RAS mutations are preserved during short time in vitro propagation and differentially impact prognosis. PloS one, 2007;2(2):e236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000236

9. Devitt B., Liu W., Salemi R., et al. Clinical outcome and pathological features associated with NRAS mutation in cutaneous melanoma. Pigment cell & melanoma research, 2011;24(4):666–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00873.x

10. Zhang S., Xie R., Zhong A., et al. Targeted therapeutic strategies for melanoma. Chinese medical journal, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002692

11. Bauer J., Büttner P., Murali R., et al. BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma are independently associated with age, anatomic site of the primary tumor, and the degree of solar elastosis at the primary tumor site. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011;24(2):345-351. doi:10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00837.x


Review

For citations:


Stefanova Yu.Yu., Porkhanova N.V., Murashko R.A., Timoshkina N.V., Maksimov A.Yu., Timofeeva S.V. Mutational status of BRAF, NRAS genes in tumor material of patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma. Medical Genetics. 2024;23(7):51-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2024.07.51-56

Views: 103


ISSN 2073-7998 (Print)