Karyotype abnormalities in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from Russian donors
https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2023.12.59-66
Abstract
Background. Karyotyping of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is a generally accepted stage of characterization of the genetic stability of cell lines, necessary for their registration and further scientific and medical use. Recurrent karyotype anomalies can be also detected by targeted methods (FISH, qPCR), however, the laboratory-specific peculiarities of cell handling protocols can influence the pattern of aberrations.
Aim. Identification of karyotype abnormalities in iPSC lines obtained from Russian donors and their comparison with recurrent aberrations known from literature data.
Methods. Karyotyping of iPSC cultures was carried out on passage 7-28, FISH with centromeric probes was used in specific cases to clarify the frequency of trisomy detected during karyotype analysis.
Results. We analyzed karyotypes of 34 iPSC lines obtained from 19 donors. Two lines with numerical chromosomal abnormalities (+8 and +20), three lines with large structural chromosomal rearrangements (duplication in 2q and two duplications in 1q) and one line with spontaneous non-clonal chromatid breaks were revealed. Additional FISH analysis with centromeric probes of a line with mosaic trisomy 8 and an autologous line with a normal karyotype revealed the presence of an abnormal clone in both lines. Thus, the frequency of karyotype abnormalities in the analyzed iPSC lines corresponds to the literature data. Chromosomal aberrations in two of the seven abnormal lines are not described as frequent recurrent genetic anomalies in iPSCs used for targeted methods for monitoring the genetic stability of cells.
Conclusions. Our study clarifies the frequency and structure of karyotype anomalies in iPSCs obtained from Russian donors and substantiates the rationality of combining genome-wide and targeted methods for assessing the genetic stability of these cells. The presented data can be used to develop recommendations for assessing the quality of iPSC.
About the Authors
V. O. PozhitnovaRussian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115478
V. V. Sviridova
Russian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115478
A. V. Kislova
Russian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115478
P. S. Sviridov
Russian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115478
D. Zheglo
Russian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115478
E. S. Voronina
Russian Federation
1, Moskvorechie st., Moscow, 115478
References
1. Andrews P.W., Barbaric I., Benvenisty N., Draper J.S., Ludwig T., Merkle F.T., et al. The consequences of recurrent genetic and epigenetic variants in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29:1624–36.
2. Keller A., Spits C. The Impact of Acquired Genetic Abnormalities on the Clinical Translation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cells. 2021;10:3246.
3. Yoshida S., Kato T.M., Sato Y., Umekage M, Ichisaka T., Tsukahara M., et al. A clinical-grade HLA haplobank of human induced pluripotent stem cells matching approximately 40% of the Japanese population. Med. 2023;4:51-66.e10.
4. McIntire E., Taapken S., Leonhard K., Larson A.L. Genomic Stability Testing of Pluripotent Stem Cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2020;52:e107.
5. Baker D., Hirst A.J., Gokhale P.J., Juarez M.A., Williams S., Wheeler M., et al. Detecting Genetic Mosaicism in Cultures of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7:998–1012.
6. Molina-Ruiz F.J., Introna C., Bombau G., Galofre M., Canals J.M. Standardization of Cell Culture Conditions and Routine Genomic Screening under a Quality Management System Leads to Reduced Genomic Instability in hPSCs. Cells. 2022;11:1984.
7. Kondrateva E., Adilgereeva E., Amelina E., Tabakov V., Demchenko A, Ustinov K., et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell line (RCMGi001-A) from human skin fibroblasts of a cystic fibrosis patient with p.F508del mutation. Stem Cell Res. 2020;48:101933.
8. Panchuk I., Kondrateva E., Demchenko A., Grigorieva O., Erofeeva A., Amelina E., et al. Generation of two induced pluripotent stem cell lines (RCMGi005-A/B) from human skin fibroblasts of a cystic fibrosis patient with homozygous F508del mutation in CFTR gene. Stem Cell Res. 2022;64:102896.
9. Kondrateva E., Demchenko A., Slesarenko Y., Pozhitnova V., Yasinovsky M., Amelina E., et al. Generation of two induced pluripotent stem cell lines (RCMGi004-A and -B) from human skin fibroblasts of a cystic fibrosis patient with compound heterozygous F508del/W1282X mutations in CFTR gene. Stem Cell Res. 2021;52:102232.
10. Kondrateva E., Demchenko A., Slesarenko Y., Yasinovsky M., Amelina E., Tabakov V., et al. Derivation of iPSC line (RCMGi002-A) from dermal fibroblasts of a cystic fibrosis female patient with homozygous F508del mutation. Stem Cell Res. 2021;53:102251.
11. Kondrateva E., Panchuk I., Demchenko A., Grigorieva O., Zheglo D., Voronina E., et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell line (RCMGi008-A) from human skin fibroblasts of a cystic fibrosis patient with compound heterozygous F508del/CFTRdele2.3 mutations in CFTR gene. Stem Cell Res. 2022;63:102854.
12. Panchuk I.O., Grigorieva O.V., Kondrateva E.V., Kurshakova E.V., Tabakov V.Yu., Bychkov I.O., et al. Generation of two iPSC lines from patient with Mucopolysaccharidosis IV B type and autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss 12. Stem Cell Res. 2023;71:103183.
13. Kondrateva E., Grigorieva O., Kurshakova E., Panchuk I., Pozhitnova V., Voronina E., et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell line (RCMGi009-A) from urine cells of patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Stem Cell Res. 2023;70:103133.
14. Martins-Taylor K., Nisler B.S., Taapken S.M., Compton T., Crandall L., Montgomery K.D., et al. Recurrent copy number variations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:488–91.
15. Laing O., Halliwell J., Barbaric I. Rapid PCR Assay for Detecting Common Genetic Variants Arising in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Cultures. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2019;49:e83.
16. Assou S., Girault N., Plinet M., Bouckenheimer J., Sansac C., Combe M., et al. Recurrent Genetic Abnormalities in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Definition and Routine Detection in Culture Supernatant by Targeted Droplet Digital PCR. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:1–8.
17. Girish V., Lakhani A.A., Thompson S.L., Scaduto C.M., Brown L.M., Hagenson R.A., et al. Oncogene-like addiction to aneuploidy in human cancers. Science. 2023;381:eadg4521.
18. Brueckner L.M., Sagulenko E., Hess E.M., Zheglo D., Blumrich A., Schwab M., et al. Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats. Hum Genet. 2012;131:1345–59.
19. Dekel-Naftali M., Aviram-Goldring A., Litmanovitch T., Shamash J., Reznik-Wolf H., Laevsky I, et al. Screening of human pluripotent stem cells using CGH and FISH reveals low-grade mosaic aneuploidy and a recurrent amplification of chromosome 1q. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:1248–55.
20. Kislova A.V., Zheglo D., Pozhitnova V.O., Sviridov P.S., Gadzhieva E.P., Voronina E.S. Replication stress causes delayed mitotic entry and chromosome 12 fragility at the ANKS1B large neuronal gene in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Chromosome Res. 2023;31:23.
Review
For citations:
Pozhitnova V.O., Sviridova V.V., Kislova A.V., Sviridov P.S., Zheglo D., Voronina E.S. Karyotype abnormalities in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from Russian donors. Medical Genetics. 2023;22(12):59-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25557/2073-7998.2023.12.59-66